Your extensions look good - I will play with it some. I don't have a fanatical position - I use both Coffee and JS. Some people swear by Coffee and disavow JS some people prefer JS. Vimscript has its warts(like JS) but does its job.
Your classes are nice syntactic sugar, but I am used to Lua and JS plain old object based oop, and I am Ok with using OOP that way. I like the default scope thing your language does, but I feel a developer should at least know vimscript variable scopes. = has the same rules as = in JS - don't, unless you are really sure. Despite that, there are people who would still work on dicts rather than using the Ruby style classes your script seems to introduce. Coffeescript attempts to add syntactic(and sometimes semantic) sugar to JS. The reason JS exists is to script the browser, and vimscript exists to script vim. Both have lot of pitfalls, and don't have traditional OOP. I've even written a language that compiles to Vimscript because it sucks so bad. Being able to use most text editors at an intermediate level is waste of time.> Although you might not want to debate whether Vimscript is better or worse than elisp, I don't mind. But, no matter which editor you choose, stick to one or two until you become an advanced user. Other editors like sublime text, VS code, and so forth are also worth learning and using. Emacs if you have a long-term plan to master a programmable editor vim as a default editor in the terminalģ. Regardless of all the situations, learning basic vim in the terminal will help you in any case.ġ. In that sense, using atom would be a recommendable option. For beginners, I guess Emacs requires significant time to learn to fully enjoy its wonderful functionalities. My general preference is to use an independent text editor, which is better if it is highly customizable and programmable. Most people use Emacs using GUI and emacs-client not to use too much memory. If you want to edit all of your codes within a terminal, then Vim or neovim would be the choice.Įmacs can be run in a terminal, but the functionality is limited. It truly depends on whether you want to completely avoid GUI and stick to TUI and command lines. Here's a link to Neovim's open source repository on GitHub. Neovim is an open source tool with 32K GitHub stars and 2.33K GitHub forks. On the other hand, Textadept provides the following key features:
Some of the features offered by Neovim are: Neovim and Textadept can be categorized as "Text Editor" tools. It also has a terminal version, which is ideal for work on remote machines.
#Command line install textadept mac
Textadept runs on Windows, Mac OSX, Linux, and BSD.
#Command line install textadept mac os
A fast, minimalist, and remarkably extensible text editor for Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
On the other hand, Textadept is detailed as "*A fast, minimalist, and extensible cross-platform text editor *". Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture. Neovim vs Textadept: What are the differences?ĭevelopers describe Neovim as " Vim's rebirth for the 21st century".
0 kommentar(er)
